Teachers’ and Students’ Perspectives on the Ethical Use of Artificial Intelligence in Vocational Education using Technology Acceptance Model Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54082/jiki.281Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Educational Technology, Ethical Awareness, Technology Acceptance Model, Vocational EducationAbstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into educational settings, offering benefits such as improved efficiency, personalization, and student engagement. However, its adoption also raises ethical concerns that require careful consideration. This study investigates teachers’ and students’ perspectives on the ethical use of AI in vocational education, employing the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) extended with Ethical Awareness, Trust, and Subjective Norms. A quantitative research design was applied, supported by interviews for triangulation. Data were collected from 60 students and 5 teachers in the Computer and Network Engineering program at SMK Negeri 2 Salatiga, Indonesia, all of whom had prior AI usage experience. The results indicate that Ethical Awareness significantly influences Attitude Toward Use (p = 0.002, t = 3.070), Behavioral Intention (p < 0.001, t = 6.175), and Perceived Usefulness (p < 0.001, t = 4.330). Perceived Ease of Use was found to have a positive effect on Behavioral Intention (p = 0.004, t = 2.913). Trust exhibited a strong relationship with both Actual Use (p < 0.001, t = 3.543) and Attitude Toward Use (p = 0.009, t = 2.621). Reliability testing showed Cronbach’s Alpha values above 0.70 for all key constructs, with Average Variance Extracted (AVE) values exceeding 0.50, indicating strong internal consistency and validity. These findings emphasize that ethical awareness and trust are critical determinants in fostering AI adoption in education. The study provides actionable insights for policymakers, educators, and technology developers to design training programs and guidelines that address ethical considerations, thereby ensuring responsible and sustainable AI integration in educational environments.
References
A. Bozkurt, “Generative AI and the next big thing,” Asian J. Distance Educ., vol. 18, no. 1, p. 2023, 2023, [Online]. Available: http://www.asianjde.com/
O. Usman, A. Septianti, D. Susita, and Marsofiyati, “The effect of computer self-efficacy and subjective norm on the perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and behavioural intention to use technology,” IBIMA Bus. Rev., vol. 2020, 2021, doi: 10.5171/2020.753259.
Y. Grace, benardi, N. Permana, and F. Wijayanti, “Transformasi Pendidikan Indonesia: Menerapkan Potensi Kecerdasan Buatan (AI),” J. Inf. Syst. Manag., vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 102–106, 2023.
L. Floridi, “Translating Principles into Practices of Digital Ethics: Five Risks of Being Unethical,” Philos. Technol., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 185–193, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s13347-019-00354-x.
T. K. F. Chiu, Q. Xia, X. Zhou, C. S. Chai, and M. Cheng, “Systematic literature review on opportunities, challenges, and future research recommendations of artificial intelligence in education,” Jan. 01, 2023, Elsevier B.V. doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100118.
A. D. M. T. Aisyah Anna Damayanti, Ani Nur Riska, “Menilik Potensi Artificial Intelligence Bagi Masa Depan Pendidikan Global Aisyah,” vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 81–91, 2024.
Rachmi, “Pendidikan Nilai di Era Digital: Tantangan dan Peluang,” Afeksi J. Penelit. dan Eval. Pendidik., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 326–335, 2024, doi: 10.59698/afeksi.v5i2.254.
D. Robiul, I. Arya, and A. Zakariyya, “MANFAAT KECERDASAN BUATAN UNTUK PENDIDIKAN,” 2023.
J. Mccarthy, “WHAT IS ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE?,” 2004. [Online]. Available: http://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/
J. McCarthy, M. L. Minsky, N. Rochester, and C. E. Shannon, “A Proposal for the Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence,” 2006.
B. A. P. Muhamad Rizki Firdaus, Rafael Roy Irawan, Chairul Huda Yudi Mahardika, Prasetyo Lumban Gaol, “Tantangan Teknologi Artificial Intelligence Pada Kegiatan Pembelajaran Mahasiswa,” CENDIKIA Pendidik., 2023.
I. R. Darmayanti and M. W. Girindratama, “Pengaruh Subjective Norm, Attitude dan Perceived Behavioural Control terhadap Intention to Use Parkir Elektronik,” Owner, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 319–328, 2021, doi: 10.33395/owner.v5i2.396.
F. Aslam, “The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Chatbot Technology: A Study on the Current Advancements and Leading Innovations,” Eur. J. Technol., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 62–72, 2023, doi: 10.47672/ejt.1561.
D. Rooein, “Data-driven EDU chatbots,” Web Conf. 2019 - Companion World Wide Web Conf. WWW 2019, no. May 2019, pp. 46–49, 2019, doi: 10.1145/3308560.3314191.
F. Kamalov, D. Santandreu Calonge, and I. Gurrib, “New Era of Artificial Intelligence in Education: Towards a Sustainable Multifaceted Revolution,” Sustain., vol. 15, no. 16, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.3390/su151612451.
A. Jaiswal and C. J. Arun, “Potential of Artificial Intelligence for transformation of the education system in India,” Int. J. Educ. Dev. using Inf. Commun. Technol., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 142–158, 2021.
T. K. F. Chiu, B. L. Moorhouse, C. S. Chai, and M. Ismailov, “Teacher support and student motivation to learn with Artificial Intelligence (AI) based chatbot,” Interact. Learn. Environ., 2023, doi: 10.1080/10494820.2023.2172044.
Setyawati, “PENGARUH PERCEIVED USEFULLNESS, PERCEIVED EASE OF USE TERHADAP BEHAVIORAL INTENTION TO USE DENGAN ATITTUDE TOWARDS USING SEBAGAI VARIABEL INTERVENING,” vol. 2507, no. February, pp. 1–9, 2020.
Arif Setia Sandi A., B. Soedijono, and A. Nasiri, “Pengaruh Perceived Usefulness dan Perceived Ease of Use Terhadap Attitude Toward Using Dengan Metode TAM Pada Sistem Informasi Magang Kerja,” IT J. Res. Dev., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 109–118, 2020, doi: 10.25299/itjrd.2021.vol5(2).5287.
R. C.-J. of R. in B. and Management and undefined 2021, “The effect of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use on perceived value and actual usage of technology on the online service of Pt. Garuda Indonesia,” Academia.Edu, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 2347–3002, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://www.academia.edu/download/66264635/G09045965.pdf
C. Wang et al., “An empirical evaluation of technology acceptance model for Artificial Intelligence in E-commerce,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 8, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18349.
R. Maulana and I. Zoraya, “Pengaruh Perceived Ease Of Use, Kepercayaan dan Literasi Keuangan Terhadap Penggunaan ShopeePay pada Masyarakat Bengkulu,” Jesya, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 640–654, 2024, doi: 10.36778/jesya.v7i1.1442.
N. I. Safitri, “PENGARUH PERCEIVED USEFULNESS, PERCEIVED EASE OF USE, DAN TRUST TERHADAP ATTITUDE, DAN PENGARUH ATTITUDE PADA PURCHASE INTENTION KONSUMEN SHOPEE RINGKASAN,” AT-TAWASSUTH J. Ekon. Islam, vol. VIII, no. I, pp. 1–19, 2023.
Zen Munawar, Herru Soerjono, Novianti Indah Putri, Hernawati, and Andina Dwijayanti, “Manfaat Kecerdasan Buatan ChatGPT Untuk Membantu Penulisan Ilmiah,” TEMATIK, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 54–60, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.38204/tematik.v10i1.1291.
Y. P. Antoroputri, D. Priharsari, and A. R. Perdanakusuma, “Eksplorasi Perspektif Mahasiswa dalam Penggunaan Turnitin untuk Menghindari Plagiasi,” 2022. [Online]. Available: http://j-ptiik.ub.ac.id
G. C. Adiyati and A. Supriyanto, “Penyebab Dan Dampak Bagi Seseorang Yang melakukan Tindakan Plagiarisme Dalam Penulisan Karya Ilmiah,” 2020.
A. C. Dewanto, “Risiko Dan Mitigasi Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan Dalam Bidang Pendidikan,” Pros. Konf. Ilm. Pendidik., vol. Volume 4 T, 2023.
R. N. Yahya, S. N. Azizah, and Y. T. Herlambang, “Pemanfaatan ChatGPT di Kalangan Mahasiswa: Sebuah Tinjauan Etika Teknologi dalam Perspektif Filsafat,” Upgrad. J. Pendidik. Teknol. Inf., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 53–59, 2024, doi: 10.30812/upgrade.v1i2.3481.
A. A. P. A. Luon and A. Primastiwi, “Pengaruh Norma Subjektif, Machiavellianisme, Kolektivisme, Dan Etika Terhadap Niat Melakukan Pengungkapan Kecurangan (Whistlebllowing),” Pengaruh Norma Subj. Machiavellianisme, Kolekt. Dan Etika Terhadap Niat Melakukan Pengungkapan Kecurangan, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 01–09, 2022, doi: 10.52005/bisnisman.v4i1.60.
R. Pambudi, A. Budiman, A. W. Rahayu, A. N. R. Sukanto, and Y. Hendrayani, “Dampak Etika Siber Jejaring Sosial Pada Pembentukan Karakter Pada Generasi Z,” J. Syntax Imp. J. Ilmu Sos. dan Pendidik., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 289–300, 2023, doi: 10.36418/syntax-imperatif.v4i3.262.
F. D. Davis, “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology,” MIS Q. Manag. Inf. Syst., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 319–339, 1989, doi: 10.2307/249008.
D. Gefen, E. Karahanna, and D. W. Straub, “Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model,” Environ. Sci. Technol., vol. 14, no. 10, p. 1175, 2003, doi: 10.1021/es60170a601.
M. G. Md Johar and J. A. Ahmad Awalluddin, “The Role of Technology Acceptance Model in Explaining Effect on E-Commerce Application System,” Int. J. Manag. Inf. Technol., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 1–14, 2011, doi: 10.5121/ijmit.2011.3301.
Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Bisnis (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D). Bandung, Jawa Barat: Alfabeta, 2009.
N. Rai and B. Thapa, “A study on purposive sampling method in research,” KathmanduKathmandu Sch. Law, pp. 1–12, 2019, [Online]. Available: http://stattrek.com/survey-research/sampling-methods.aspx?Tutorial=AP,%0Ahttp://www.academia.edu/28087388
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nathan Christianto Kekado, Krismiyati Krismiyati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
